Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales” Essay

Free Essay Database Online

Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales” Essay

The term character can be applied in several ways. It can intend either a physical being. or to their entire form of behaviour. In Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. one is used to complement the other. He frequently uses certain physical features to order precisely how the individual is traveling to act* . This is most apparent in the Summoner’s Tale. The Summoner is ugly. with a chilling face. but besides turns out to hold a really ugly personality. between his occupation. attitudes. and values. which come out through his physical descriptions. ** . Chaucer’s usage of physical features is most obvious in the Summoner’s Tale.

The Summoner is a chilling sight. but non merely because he looks so horrid. He besides has a horrid job- a summoner is a sort of spiritual premium huntsman. He seeks down people that need to make their repentances and do certain they do them. He is described as holding acne so bad “no mercury. lead unction. potassium bitartrate pick. / no native sulfur. no boracic. so it seems. / could do a salve… to bring around his whelks of knobby white. ” So. when people saw him coming. they would already be repulsed merely by his physical image. However. if they knew who he was. they would besides be afraid that he was coming to acquire them. So. he is chilling in more than one manner.

His behaviour is every bit ugly as his face. “Questio quid juris was his ticket. ” The Latin phrase questio British pound juris means “the inquiry is. what is the point in jurisprudence? ” He is supposed to be continuing the Church’s jurisprudence. but was known to turn his dorsum ( for a fee ) . Finally. he was an blackmailer. with a bosom every bit black as his face fungus. He would larn people’s secrets and so state them he would state the Church. They would pay him to maintain his oral cavity shut. Sometimes he even set them up with a miss for vino.

Chaucer’s image of the Summoner with “his face on fire” helps depict his fiery attitudes. even though it straight refers to his facial characteristics. He is prone to drunken furies. frequently spurting Latin phrases and reasoning with people. In fact. his whole narrative is told because he was huffy at the Friar for dissing him. He is really argumentative. and vulgar. He tells a rough narrative about the hereafter of Friars. in retaliation for the Friar’s Tale. as manner of prologue into his narrative. Even his narrative is about a greedy Friar. who is so despairing he looks beneath a ill man’s natess for something “hidden at that place for secretiveness. ” Upon having a loud flatus. he is shocked. but what else can he hold expected? Harmonizing to the Summoner. Friars are avaricious and stupid. a really immature effort to derive retaliation on the Friar. showing how revengeful he is.

Finally. he does non believe in the traditional values of mediaeval Christianity. although he is supposed to be one of its advocates. He is described as holding a “garland set upon his caput. ” taking the reader into believing he is a homosexual. He allows work forces to perpetrate wickednesss. like criminal conversation. without penalty every bit long as they paid him. Normally he took his payments in the signifier of vino. but besides accepted hard currency. “Why he’d let -just for a quart of wine- / any good chap to maintain a concubine/ a year! ” He was really corrupt. a common subject in Chaucer’s clergy. By accepting payoffs to maintain his oral cavity shut. he was basically blackjacking the work forces of the community. alternatively of stating person like he was supposed to. As his description says he “Sang deep seconds to [ the Pardoner’s ] vocal. ” a love vocal.

He has a deep voice. and is singing harmoniousness to the Pardoner. proposing their relationship is more than concern related. Homosexuality was about a wickedness in the Middle Ages. but for one who was supposed to do other wage for their wickednesss he had a leaning for ignoring them. “As he pleased the adult male could convey duress/ on any immature chap in the diocese/ he knew their secrets. they did what he said. ” He held them in fright of being cursed. and go forth them no hope for redemption. by swinging their wickednesss over their caputs. So they must make as he says. A Medieval adult male is non supposed to do others harm. but seek to assist them. In fact. his occupation was to seek to salvage them by doing certain they atoned for their wickednesss and gained entry into Eden. So even by the nature of his occupation. he isn’t keeping to traditional values.

In decision. Chaucer efficaciously sketched the character of the Summoner. utilizing physical traits to try to analyse the underlying traits of the character. The reader can go really familiar with who he is ( liar. drinker. blackmailer ) merely by the manner Chaucer describes him physically ( ugly. big hickeies and furuncles on his face ) . even though the image is backed up by the character’s ain actions ( imbibing. allowing immature work forces commit criminal conversation and other wickednesss ) .