Comparsion Between Hearst And Citizen Kane Essay

Free Essay Database Online

Comparsion Between Hearst And Citizen Kane Essay

, Research Paper

Citizen Kane is said to be one of the greatest films of all-time, but it did non come without contention. The contention around this film is based on the thought that Charles Foster Kane is the fictionalisation of William Randolph Hearst, a egotistic newspaper publishing house, politician, and affluent millionaire. The singular analogues between Kane and Hearst include their houses, their newspapers and their usage of money.

Both Kane and Hearst construct dramatic and singular houses. In Citizen Kane, Charles Foster Kane builds a castle know as Xanadu. Xanadu is referred to in myths and verse forms as topographic point of Eden on Earth like, Avalon, Shangri-La, and Atlantis. Samuel Purchas wrote this in & # 8220 ; Purchas his Pilgrimage or Relationss of the World and the Religions observed in all Ages and Places discovered, from Creation unto this Present: & # 8221 ;

In Xamdu did Cublai Can construct a baronial Palace, embracing sixteene stat mis of plaine land with a wall wherein are fertile Meddowes, pleasant springs, delightfull Streams, and all kinds of animals of pursuit and game, and in the middest thereof a deluxe house of pleasance, which may be removed from topographic point to put? Kane & # 8217 ; s house in Citizen Kane fits this description good it had hayfields, springs, watercourses, and statues of all kinds of animate beings, whether pursuit or game. Hearst house in California & # 8217 ; s Santa Lucia Mountains besides fits Samuel Purhas description of Xanadu. Hearst house is known as La Cuesta Encantada or The Enchanted Hill. The Enchanted Hill has 165 room & # 8217 ; s 127 estates of gardens, patios, pools and paseos. The suites are furnished with impressive aggregation of Spanish and Italian old-timers.

The manner both work forces got into the newspaper concern is instead similar. In the film, Kane & # 8217 ; s father figure, Thatcher is worried that Kane will non understand his topographic point in the universe. Thatcher concerns are confirmed when Kane sends a wire stating that he has no involvement in gilded mines or Bankss, but would instead wish to take over a little newspaper which is in his ownership. Kane states that he would to take over The Morning Inquirer, because, & # 8220 ; I think it would be fun to compose a newspaper. & # 8221 ; ( Citizen Kane ) Hearst entered the newspaper universe were really similar. In 1880 Hearst & # 8217 ; s male parent, additions ownership of a little newspaper in San Francisco called The Examiner. Hearst male parent was losing monolithic sums of money on the paper when Hearst asked for control of the paper. Hearst & # 8217 ; s male parent trusting his boy would take his topographic point in the household excavation and ranching concern, eventually conceded and allowed William to run the paper. Both Hearst and Kane instantly began to revolutionise everything about their several documents. Both work forces threw themselves into their documents, Kane moved into his office so that he could invariably alter his paper, so he could invariably be able to make and remake the paper at any hr, dark or twenty-four hours. Kane stated from now on, The Inquirer is traveling to describe all intelligence, big or little, particularly if it could be made into a esthesis and later sell more newspapers. They were traveling to describe more than the intelligence that the last editor considered newsworthy. If there were nil exciting to sell newspapers Kane would make it. Kane told people that if they would supply the prose and verse forms, he would provide the war. Hearst did the same thing with his paper, describing about subjects that were non considered newsworthy by anyone but him. Hearst told his newsmans that if they provide the images, he would supply the war. Both Hearst and Kane spent luxuriant sums of money on acquiring the best staff and higher circulation. Both work forces finally develop huge newspaper cyberspace

plants covering the state.

Kane used his monolithic newspaper web to assist defame Jim Getty in his political race for Governor. Kane besides used his newspapers to assist advance and promote his 2nd married woman, Susan Alexander. Kane tried to utilize his documents to alter Susan from a atrocious to a great opera vocalist. He did this by pull stringsing the intelligence and, hence, seeking to command what people read thought. Kane used his documents to assail companies in which he was the major shareholder. Charles Foster Kane had success in assailing big companies on the behalf of the people ; he would be the people & # 8217 ; s research worker. He would publish false headlines such as the Spanish armada docked off the Jersey seashore. Headlines that he had about no cogent evidence to endorse up the narrative with.

Like Kane, Hearst used his paper to seek to acquire what he wanted. Hearst used his documents to prosecute in mud-slinging run against Theodore Roosevelt for the governor of New York. Both work forces use their publication to portray each other as jail birds. Although the film differs from existent life here, because Roosevelt defeated Hearst reasonably, there was no dirt like that, which stopped Kane. Like Kane, Hearst used his paper to progress the calling if his kept woman, Marion Davies. Unlike Susan Alexander, Marion Davies was a gifted vocalist and could hold a successful calling without Hearst. Hearst discovered that his newspaper were a beginning of great power and so utilize them to pull strings the intelligence, people and states. Hearst would besides publish false headlines about the Spanish ferociousness in the Cuban revolution, even though they & # 8217 ; re nil of kind traveling on. Hearst like assailing large companies as the people & # 8217 ; s title-holder and like Kane contradicted himself when he supported the eight-hour twenty-four hours and the labour brotherhoods ( Swanberg 235 ) .

Both these work forces used their money for one and merely one intent, to acquire what they want. Both Kane and Hearst had huge lucks from gilded mines and other investings. They both did non care about passing their lucks either. Kane went and the bought the staff from the Chronicle and Hearst was reported to pay about any salary without a attention in the universe. When Thatcher told Kane that in one twelvemonth on the Inquirer, Kane had lost one million dollars, Kane responded with & # 8220 ; That means I can still run the paper for 60 old ages & # 8221 ; ( Citizen Kane ) . Hearst was seen to throw away money as if it literally grew on trees. Both work forces most of the clip tried to purchase love, they thought that possibly if the gave person adequate money they would love them. When Leland says that Kane is non roll uping diamonds, but roll uping person who is roll uping diamonds ( Citizen Kane ) . Besides, when Kane uses his money to construct opera houses for Susan Alexander. These are illustration of utilizing his money to seek to acquire love. Hearst used his money to make Cosmopolitan magazine and publication company for the intent of doing Marion Davies a star. Hearst would throw munificent parties and presentation in hope to acquire more people to love him.

Sing the dramatic similarities between Kane and Hearst, one finds it is difficult to believe that Citizen Kane was non based on William Randolph Hearst & # 8217 ; s life. Citizen Kane was nominated for nine academy awards, but was forced to be shown in private theatre, which is another illustration of Hearst utilizing money to acquire what he wants

Citizen Kane. Dir. Orson Welles. With Orson Welles, Joseph Cotten, Dorothy

Comingore. RKO, 1941.

MacIntyre Diane, The Silents Majority.

hypertext transfer protocol: // //www.hearstcorp.comSwanberg, W.A. Citizen Hearst. Scribner, 1961. Bantam Matrix Edition, 1967.