“Health Disparities” in Uninsured Americans Essay

Free Essay Database Online

“Health Disparities” in Uninsured Americans Essay

Harmonizing to ( Kilbourne. Switzer & A ; Fine. ( 2006 ) . Health disparities are important differences that are needed and viewed clinically and statistically in wellness attention and wellness results. These differences between groups of people can impact how frequently an unwellness ( disease ) have group affects. the figure of people who have gotten ill and how many times do this peculiar disease or job ends up with decease happening. There are a figure of populations that can be affected by wellness disparities. ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

Some of these differences are:

Cultural and racial minorities

Rural country occupants

The aged. kids and adult females

Peoples with disablements. ( Medline Plus. com. . ( 2013 ) .

Health disparity can besides be defined as differences of populations in wellness attention entree. environmental exposures. wellness position. quality or use and results affecting your wellness. Health disparities are related by and large to societal issues and healthcare systems. The world-wide web coming in being in the mid – 1990’s besides can take to wellness disparities since some cultural groups would non be able to afford the cyberspace. One of the aims of Healthy People 2010 was to supply more cyberspace services to the place. ( Gibbons. ( 2005 ) .

Since this survey will be a quantitative survey it will concentrate on the entire figure of uninsured or underinsured Americans who didn’t have wellness insurance by the terminal of 2012. Another focal point of this survey will be coming up with possible solutions to this turning tendency in health care. In this survey we will besides seek to detect how the uninsured or underinsured persons or households are being effected positively and negatively by deriving feedback from these persons. There are several ways to obtain this feedback for this survey in which we will be carry oning studies and questionnaires to acquire the replies we need.

These ways are: the grounds why they do non hold insurance to find how this may impact their entree to care. to find whether the cost of attention is straight impacting the ground why these persons may non be insured and in this survey we need to seek to happen the jobs. come up with solutions and expression for ways to acquire rid of any barriers to individuals so that they can happen low-cost wellness attention policies. Since the Affordable Care Act of 2010 is in consequence we need to analyze how the debut of a new health care jurisprudence to wholly replace the health care system that has been in topographic point for old ages will consequence uninsured and underinsured Americans.

Harmonizing to the article by ( parkdatabase. org. . ( 2012 ) . For the study we will be carry oning our study samples will be coming from males and females who are American citizens. all races or cultural groups. 200 participants will be every bit divided by gender. In order to cover a broad assortment of people that are being effected by wellness disparities in quantitative research normally will necessitate a big sample size in order to quantify the research. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

Background of the Study

There are several factors that join together populations to act upon someone’s wellness and wellness position which consequences into wellness disparity. Harmonizing to the Healthcare Fairness Act of 2000 House Resolution # 3250. populations that have wellness disparities suffer from Numberss that are important as it relates to the entire rate of incidence of disease. mortality. endurance and morbidity when compared to the population in general. The most conducive factor to wellness disparities most frequently mentioned when watched in the United States population is Socioeconomic position ( SES ) . Other factors related to wellness disparities include: physical and cultural environment. life style. working and living conditions. and community and societal webs. Socioeconomic position can be defined as how individuals. families. households. and sums and nose count contracts as it relates to the size to devour or make goods that our society values. ( Shavers. ( 2007 ) .

The quality of health care experienced by our patients may be related to issues of disparity. socio-environmental determiners of wellness. pattern fluctuation. and substandard of attention as scientific grounds seemed to demo by the late 1990’s. ( Gibbons. ( 2005 ) . Since Disparities in the United States can be caused by instead a mixture that is complex. historic hurt intertwined with jobs with entree along with systematic quality. Health disparities have many sides which include ethnicity. position. geographics and race.

For policymakers it is critically of import to give significance to the job in the right manner to do certain any solutions that are goal-related will be able to turn to the solutions reached. The end is to supply wellness security for everyone no affair what your socio-economic characters are. Even though the United States end is to wholly acquire rid wellness disparities there will be attempts to go a portion of a broader attempt to alter wellness attention and by making so. there must be focus on bettering the quality of attention delivered to patients separately first and foremost. ( Frist. ( 2005 ) .

We can now inquire the inquiry. Why the survey of wellness disparity should be pursued and for whom is the survey of import to? The survey of wellness disparity should be pursued because if nil else but to find if the research into wellness disparity will demo any differences in organisational characteristics that are specific. Furthermore the thought that organisational factors may play a important function in wellness disparity has brought about more of a deep research on the function of organisational procedures that are changeable when you look across the intervention scene. ( Kilbourne. Switzer & A ; Fine. ( 2006 ) .

Purpose of the Statement

The intent of this survey will be to prove the model that is conceptual that will cover wellness disparities in 3 stages.

Detection

Reducing and/or Extinguishing

Understanding

The study will include 200 male and female divided every bit on uninsured Americans grownups 18 old ages and older to derive feedback on why they do non hold wellness insurance. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

Feasible Research Questions and Hypotheses

What function if any how entree to care straight affected your wellness position because you don’t have wellness insurance?

How has the cost of health care affected you separately. your households wellness position because of no wellness insurance?

How do you believe your wellness position would alter if you could afford wellness insurance?

Do you believe the new wellness attention jurisprudence will positively or negatively impact your ability to buy wellness insurance?

What factors do you believe are straight associated with the uninsured position as it relates to wellness insurance entree? ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

Hypothesiss

Having no wellness insurance is straight impacting my entree to care.

Besides the cost of attention while holding no wellness insurance is straight impacting my general wellness of me every bit good as my household.

Besides. if I had no cost for wellness insurance or low cost this would positively impact my wellness position every bit good as my household.

With the Affordable Care Act of 2010 partly enforced. how do you believe this jurisprudence will be straight associated with your uninsured position when it comes to entree to wellness insurance. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

Nature of the Study

Design

The strengths of Experimental Designs research harmonizing to the text edition. ( Frankfort-Nachmias. & A ; Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . designs begins with the apprehension of the 4 constituents of research design which are: _comparison ( correlativity of two variables ) . use ( control over ) . control. ( remotion of other factors ( . and generalisation ( different scenes. larger populations can be use ) . _ ( Frankfort-Nachmias. & A ; Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . The strengths of experimental designs is it will assist a research worker understand the logic behind all other research designs. another strength is that an experiment lets the research worker observe and pull illations that are insouciant with less trouble no affair what type of variable is used and it allows research workers to be able to understand other design restrictions. ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

Harmonizing to the writer. ( Bhattacherjee. ( 2012 ) . The restrictions of Experimental Design research can be in the universe of experimentation. the state of affairs in the existent universe may non ever associate. in state of affairss where you have to randomly delegate the individuals to groups this may be impossible and unethical and another restriction would be acquiring rid of variables that are immaterial may non even be possible. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

Harmonizing to text edition by. ( Frankfort-Nachmias. & A ; Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . When I consider the quantitative research program I am developing and my research inquiries. hypotheses. and variables. I would urge the authoritative experimental design for research. The ground is my research program involves. “Health Disparities. ” which is a subject that can touch on several specific groups whether it be based on race. gender. insured. uninsured. In the authoritative experimental research design as the research worker you do hold more control over the intrinsic and extrinsic variables for your research which is an advantage for me. Besides in experimental design it allows the research worker to hold control to present the variable that independent to assist find which way the causing is being led to.

Since Health Disparities will necessitate to cover several countries in order to be effectual I feel that experimental research design offers me the best opportunity of making the end of my research which are three stages: 1. Detection. 2. Understanding of the job and 3. acquiring rid of or extinguishing wellness disparities all together. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

Since there are so many issues that are impacting “Health Disparities in our universe today. I feel I need to take a research design program that offers flexibleness to the research workers which allows them to properly research the issue. look at all sides to the issues to assist come up with valid and ethical decisions. Besides. since I want to concentrate on uninsured Americans. merely like me. and a hot subject in our universe today. I will necessitate an research design that will help in my success to decently research this issue to the full.

three. Instrumentality and stuffs

Harmonizing to the writers. ( Keppel. Pamuk. Lynch. Carter-Pokras. Kim. Mays. Pearcy. Schoenbach. & A ; Weisman. ( 2005 ) . S The degrees of measuring that will be of import for my survey in Health Disparities can affect at the nominal degree. ordinal degree and ratio degree. Health disparities can be measured harmonizing to six issues that are between populations and groups:

1. a mention point will necessitate to be selected in order to mensurate disparity.

2. Disparity need to be measured in either comparative or absolute footings.

3. Measurements for wellness disparities need to be in footings of adverse or favourable events.

4. Health disparity needs to be measured in drumhead manner or pair-wise.

5. In wellness disparity you need to take whether to weigh groups harmonizing to the size of the group.

6. In wellness disparity at that place needs to be a determination whether to order the groups in a built-in manner. ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

Harmonizing to the text edition. ( Frankfort-Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . The nominal degree will be of import to my survey on wellness disparity because at this degree you can mensurate a different symbol that will stand for each symbol. For illustration: ethnicity. gender. nationality. soldierly position. faith. and where you live.

Harmonizing to Messer. ( 2008 ) . The ratio degree is besides another degree of measuring that can be used in my research survey on Health disparities because variables at this degree have fixed natural zero points and absolute because these variable can be based on length. clip. weight and country. Frankfort-Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . Ratio measuring are the most common degree of measuring used in disparity due to the graduated table of measuring. At the ratio degree when mensurating disparity it can be used in both as an absolute step every bit good as a degree of ratio. ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

Validity in research is concerned with whether you are mensurating what you truly necessitate to or mean to mensurate for your research. There are three sorts cogency in research: content. empirical and concept cogency.

I will guarantee content cogency. empirical cogency. and concept cogency for my survey in wellness disparity in uninsured Americans by first understanding what each of the three types of cogency mean:

1. Contented cogency is when your measurings are really covering all countries you are meaning to step. In other words. nil is left out. Harmonizing to the text edition writers ( Frankfort-Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . Under content cogency we have what is called face cogency or the researcher’s rating that is subjective in their research. Another content cogency is called trying cogency which is concerned about whether the population given in the research is sampled adequately. ( Frankfort-Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . Since wellness disparity covers a big country to be sampled. as a research worker I will hold to happen one country to concentrate on such as “uninsured Americans. covering individuals 18 old ages and older. male and females. all cultural groups will all be a portion of the sample. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

Harmonizing to writers ( Hidalgo & A ; Goodman. ( 2012 ) . Empirical cogency refers to the relationship that is between an instrument that needs to be measured and the results of the measurings. Construct cogency relates the issues you are mensurating to theoretical model that is general. In disparities research it will be of import to measure the criterion standards needed for the research to make what it is intended to make. particularly if you are utilizing different populations. In some instances. questionnaires may be needed to make cogency in the survey. but non in all surveies. If in your disparities research for uninsured Americans. where things like racism. race. cultural groups which are considered concepts that are societal can be difficult to mensurate. ( Felton. 2013 )

Harmonizing to the article from ( Active Campaign. ( 2009 ) . In order to guarantee cogency in my research utilizing content research which will be necessitating all countries in my research I want to cover as it relates to wellness disparities for the uninsured American I would necessitate to utilize a subjective signifier of measuring. ( Felton. 2013 ) . In the text edition. ( Frankfort-Nachmias. ( 2008 ) . The strengths and restrictions in the dependability and cogency I chose Construct cogency strengths are based on how many dimensions and steps construct cogency has. concept cogency can be operated in a figure of ways. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

In order to guarantee dependability for the measuring in my survey. first I need to understand as a research worker the importance in the grade of dependability. Reliability is when your mensurating instrument contain variable mistakes or errors that appear non all the clip between your observation of your research for one clip merely or every clip a variable is measured. So measurings contain two constituents which are called mistake constituent and true constituent. To farther explain dependability which is measured on a ratio between true-score discrepancy and discrepancy in the entire mark measured. To guarantee that my research survey on wellness disparities is dependable for the measuring I will necessitate to be able to separate that the consequences of the research may non be the exact same each clip it is done. ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

The strengths and restrictions when it comes to wellness disparities in the footings of dependability and cogency can be linked to the fact that there are several constituents by which wellness disparities can be measured. Empirical cogency and dependability are portion of the research that deals with wellness disparities. One strength of empirical cogency is relationships between anticipation and consequences.

Harmonizing to the writers. ( Ogden and Lo. ( 2011 ) . The graduated table that is most appropriate to utilize for researching wellness disparities in uninsured America Likert graduated table ( trials attitudes ) since it requires the research worker construct a list of points that needs to be scaled. random research. so entire of consequences. In utilizing Likert graduated tables there will be some restrictions in the research affecting wellness disparities. Some restrictions are due to the argument on the function of comparings socially and the impact it would convey on how the graduated tables are completed and the consequences of the informations being researched. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

Harmonizing to writers Lobo and Mateus. ( 2013 ) . Since in wellness disparities there are so many countries that need to be measured even entree to wellness attention and graduated tables for measuring can assist to accomplish the needful consequences for the research worker if you take into history the facets of the graduated table that you can heighten and you will go on to necessitate to formalize graduated tables in your other populations. ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

Harmonizing to ( Nowjack-Raymer. ( 2013 ) . the trial that is appropriate for my wellness disparities research program would likely looking to better understand inequalities every bit good as wellness disparities. another trial could affect developing proving with intercessions that would be aiming people populating in poorness. and we could besides see proving execution and airing attacks for geographic expedition to findings that would be effectual in order to guarantee interlingual rendition that is fast that could be put into pattern. convey about some policies with action within communities. ( Felton. ( 2013 ) .

The populations used for the graduated table and trial as it relates to wellness disparities harmonizing to the NIDCR writers ( Nowjack-Raymer. ( 2013 ) . will affect research that will be focused on the vulnerable and deprived population in subgroups. The proving population could include:

Elders

All cultural and racial populations that are considered to be under wellness disparities. this will include Hispanic ( Mexican. Puerto Rican. South and Central America. Cuban. and all Spanish speech production states ) . African Americans. Native Americans. Pacific Islander. and Alaskan

Rural low income individuals. urban inhabitants. including Appalachian mountainss

Persons who are unable leave their places due to disablements and individuals who are in establishments the particular demands populations that includes individuals populating with AIDS. developmental or acquired rational or physical disablements. ( Nowjack-Raymer. ( 2013 )

Datas analysis program:

Since in plan research there a figure that is limited in the attempts to measure and make wellness disparities affecting new schemes with the wellness attention system. Here are some of these plan that are being supported by the AHRQ – Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for illustration:

( EXCEED ) or Excellence Centers to Extinguish Ethnic/Racial Disparities. this is a grant plan that looks for ways to extinguish wellness disparities. ( Gillian. ( 2004 ) .

Sampling

Harmonizing to web site ( HHS. gov. . ( 2013 ) . For my Quantitative Research Plan on Health Disparities utilizing ratio measuring because it is the most common degree used to mensurate disparity. The population ( units of analysis that are relevant ) for this research will include all uninsured African Americans in the United States today. Statistically harmonizing to the new Health Care Law or the Affordable Care Act there are 6. 8 million African Americans eligible for benefits under the ACA. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

The population for my survey includes all uninsured African Americans in the United States harmonizing to the ACA. Population: 6. 8 million – African Americans ( including male and female ) . about half of this figure of immature grownups. This population demand to be defined on the footing of: A. Content. B. Extent. and C. Time. Size: 6. 8 million. ( HHS. gov. . ( 2013 ) . I have made a alteration in my population for research which will be foremost happening a mention point which is critical when making research on disparity.

Harmonizing to the writers. ( Keppel. Pamuk. Lynch. Careter-Pokras. Kim. Mays. Pearcy. Schoenbach. and Weissman. ( 2005 ) . I will besides necessitate to mensurate disparity in comparative or absolution footings. Disparity is really obvious when you realize that disparity occurs when the sum that separates a group from a mention point that is specified on a step that is peculiar to wellness that is expressed in the footings of per centum. rate. means or some other step that is quantitative. ( Felton. 2013 ) .

. Harmonizing to writers. ( Keppel. et Al. ( 2005 ) Sampling: an person within the Population such as for illustration the immature grownup population size of 3. 2 million or 47 % don’ T have wellness insurance from the ages 18 to 35 old ages of age. Type of Sampling used: Probability sampling. A sample demand to be able to stand for the population it will be used for. When you want to mensurate a sample and your aim is to work from single groups in a certain sphere so utilize comparings that are pair-wise. When you summarize the steps used in your disparity this will quantify all the groups in resistance and any decisions based on your drumhead consequences should be joined and interpreted utilizing all groups. ( Felton. 2013 )

How the sample will be drawn?

When disparities are measured. foremost the mention point demand to be identified. following if any two groups need to be compared the mention point with the favourable group demand to be used ( lowest rates ) . When utilizing disparities samples it should be measured in both comparative and absolute footings and when you are mensurating disparities over assorted of wellness indexs it should be shown in footings of events that are inauspicious.

Why did you take this sample size and why it was chosen in relation to the size of your population?

I ab initio chose this sample size since I had 3 populations to take from for the uninsured African American population which were male. female. or immature grownups and I chose the immature grownup population since I had a solid statistical figure of how many of immature grownups between the ages of 18 to 35 who are uninsured. I am non wholly positive that taking a sample size stand foring 1000000s of people will be the right class for me to take and I had a awful clip seeking to make a graph or chart to demo my Numberss and I could non acquire the graph to demo.

Since the figure of uninsured Americans is really high even with the Affordable Care Act being in topographic point. I may hold to see working in another country in wellness disparity. I was trying to making a basic line graph chart demoing the age of immature grownups with no wellness insurance. Since wellness disparities screens such a broad scope of issues I will hold to reconsider what country under wellness disparity I want to cover and research.

Ethical Concerns

Health Disparities research has emerging progresss which include comparative effectivity surveies and controlled tests that are frequently conducted at academic sites and multiple communities. The institutional reappraisal boards ( IRBs ) has presented a hindrance that is major to the effectual and timely behavior of wellness disparity research. When the research involved the underserved communities and minority along with institutional demands. ethical criterions reading may be different. These differences can do complications in the research protocol and informed consent procedure and may hold a negative consequence on how the participants will esteem this type of research and the quality of the tests.

Besides the IRB or institutional reappraisal board. can besides take to holds that are unneeded. endangering the capacity to execute collaborative undertakings and support. The Research Centers in Minority Institutions ( RCMI ) . Translational Research Network ( TRN ) have created a community-partnered attack to run side by side with the IRB reappraisal straight across the 18 RCMI establishments grantees that make certain conformity while doing it better quality of wellness disparity research. ( Hammatt. . and Nishitani. Junko and Heslin. Kevin and Perry and Szetela. and Jones. and Williams. and Antoine-LaVigne. and Forge. and Norris. Keith C. ( 2011 ) .

Even though Americans are populating longer and are healthier. wellness disparities still exist. However. policymakers are doing a response to the wellness disparity issue by seting together and presenting statute law that are geared toward acquiring rid of wellness disparities. ( ncsl. org. . ( 2014 ) .

The Uninsured Americans as a wellness disparity

There is about 44 million Americans entire without wellness insurance and another 38 million Americans who do non hold adequate wellness insurance to run into their health care demands. If individuals do non hold wellness insurance it will normally intend seting besides necessary attention such as:

Childhood Immunizations

Preventive attention

Everyday check-ups

no Primary attention physician

no entree or limited entree to prescription drugs

being hospitalized for a status that otherwise would non hold led to a infirmary stay that could hold been avoided if you had wellness insurance

Because of fright of medical measures you may take to detain attention which will normally take to more cost to you. particularly if you have to travel to the exigency room.

We must besides understand that when the uninsured individuals face a wellness crisis because they can’t pay the load of the cost will be to the insured population. ( Glied. ( 2014 ) .

Mentions:

Active Campaign. ( 2009 ) . Validity in Research Design. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. activecampaign. com/blog/validity-in-research-design/

Bhattacherjee. A. . ( 2012 ) . SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH: PRINCIPLES. METHODS. AND PRACTICES. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //scholarcommons. usf. edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi? article=1002 & A ; context=oa_textbooks

Felton. ( 2013 ) . _An analysis of personality theory. _ Unpublished

manuscript. Walden University.

Frankfort-Nachmias. C. . & A ; Nachmias. D. ( 2008 ) . Research Methods in the Social Sciences 7th Ed. New York: Deserving

Frist. W. . ( 2005 ) . Get the better ofing Disparities in U. S. Healthcare. _Health Affairs. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //content. healthaffairs. org/content/24/2/445. short. _

Edward gibbons. M. . ( 2005 ) . A Historical Overview of Health Disparities and the Potential of eHealth Solutions. _Journal of Medical Internet Research. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. jmir. org/2005/5/e50/_

Gillian. S. . ( 2004 ) . Addressing Unequal Treatment: Disparities in Healthcare. _The Common Fund. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. commonwealthfund. org/usr_doc/SteelFisher_unequaltreatment_cong2004_70 9. pdf? section=4039_

Glied. S. . ( 2014 ) . The Uninsured. Retrieved from the website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. phosphate buffer solution. org/healthcarecrisis/uninsured. hypertext markup language

HHS. gov ( Health attention. . . The Affordable Care Act and the African Americans. Retrieved from web site
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Department of Health and Human Services. gov/healthcare/facts/factsheets/2012/04/aca-and-african- americans04122012a. html012 ) .

( HAMMATT. . AND NISHITANI. JUNKO AND HESLIN. KEVIN AND PERRY AND SZETELA. AND JONES. AND WILLIAMS. AND ANTOINE-LAVIGNE. AND FORGE. AND NORRIS. KEITH C. ( 2011 ) . PARTNERING TO HARMONIZE IRBS FOR COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH TO REDUCE HEALTH DISPARITIES. PUBMED. GOV. RETRIEVED FROM WEBSITE HTTP: //WWW. NCBI. NLM. NIH. GOV/PUBMED/22102302

( Hidalgo & A ; Goodman. ( 2012 ) . Validation of Self-Reported Measures in Health Disparities Research. _Journal of Biometricss and Biostatistics. Retrieved from website_ hypertext transfer protocol: //www. omicsonline. org/validation-of-self-reported-measures-in-health-disparities- research-2155-6180. 1000e114. pdf

( Keppel. Pamuk. Lynch. Carter-Pokras. Kim. Mays. Pearcy. Schoenbach. & A ; Weisman. ( 2005 ) . Methodological Issues in Measuring Health Disparities. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_141. pdf

Kilbourne. A. . Switzer. G. . Hyman. K. . Crowley-Matoka. M. . & A ; Fine. M. . ( 2006 ) . Advancing Health Disparities Research within The Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. ncbi. nlm. National Institutes of Health. gov/pmc/articles/PMC1698151/

LOBO. A. . & A ; MATEUS. S. . ( 2013 ) . VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF AN EQUITY IN HEALTH CARE SCALE. _SAGE JOURNALS. RETRIEVED FROM WEBSITE_ HTTP: //SGO. SAGEPUB. COM/CONTENT/3/4/2158244013506716

Messer. L. . ( 2008 ) . Invited Commentary: Measuring Social Disparities in Health-What Was the Question Again? _American Journal of Epiderminology. _ Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //aje. oxfordjournals. org/content/167/8/900. full. pdf

ncsl. org. . ( 2014 ) . 2014 Health Disparity Legislation. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. ncsl. org/research/health/2014-health-disparities-legislation. aspx

nlm. National Institutes of Health. gov. . Medline Plus. . ( 2013 ) . Health Disparities. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nlm. National Institutes of Health. gov/medlineplus/healthdisparities. hypertext markup language

Nowjack-Raymer. ( 2013 ) . Health Disparities Research Programs. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nidcr. National Institutes of Health. gov/Research/DER/ClinicalResearch/HealthDispar. htm

Ogden. J. . & A ; Lo. J. . ( 2011 ) . How meaningful is informations from Likert Scales? An rating of how evaluations are made and the function of the response displacement in the socially disadvantaged. Journal of Health Psychology. Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //hpq. sagepub. com/content/early/2011/08/06/1359105311417192.

Parkdatabase. org. . ( 2012 ) . Qualitative and Quantitative Research Techniques for Humanitarian Needs Assessment. _An Introductory Brief. _ Retrieved from website hypertext transfer protocol: //reliefweb. int/report/world/qualitative-and-quantitative-research-techniques- humanitarian-needs-assessment.

Shavers. V. . ( 2007 ) . Measurement of Socio-economic Status in Health Disparity Research. _Journal of National Medical Association. Retrieved from website_